When is a Vitamin Not a Vitamin? When the FDA Says So!

February 10, 2009
Print This Post Print This Post

In September of 2005, Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) senior vice president of scientific and international affairs, John Hathcock, PhD, wrote a letter to the FDA stating that “Pyridoxamine is unequivocally a dietary ingredient because it is one of the three primary natural forms of vitamin B6, and it is one of the two predominant forms in animal products used as human foods.”

But now, thanks to a petition filed with the FDA by Biostratum, the North Carolina-based manufacturer of a pyridoxamine-based drug called Pyridorin, which is designed to prevent the progression of diabetic nephropathy (kidney disease), on January 12 the FDA announced that pyridoxamine dihydrochloride was a “new drug.” This means that the FDA has now effectively prevented any substance containing pyridoxamine from being marketed as a dietary supplement. Never mind that the fish on your lunch salad and the chicken on your dinner table both contain pyridoxamine, as does brewer’s yeast!

The status of pyridoxamine has been debated by Biostratum and the Council on Responsible Nutrition (CRN) via FDA petitions since July, 2005. The issue was whether pyridoxamine was protected by DSHEA, the law protecting supplements passed in 1994.

Marketing pyridoxamine as a dietary ingredient is fully supported by the science behind this form of vitamin B6. The CRN statement warns that a precedent could be established in which the status of other ingredients is challenged as well. Companies have to keep long-term records to make sure they can substantiate that an ingredient has in fact been marketed previously as a dietary supplement. A key vitamin form that is presently at risk is P5P, the natural form of B-6 that can be used directly by the body without conversion. Because some people have difficulty converting synthetic B-6 to P5P, elimination of P5P could make them entirely dependent on drugs for survival (human beings cannot live without B-6). Yet another drug company petition has asked the FDA to ban P5P just as it has banned pyridoxamine. If you have not already sent a message to the FDA against banning P5P, please do so now.

This action by the FDA speaks to the fundamental need for reform of the agency. AAHF believes the FDA needs complete reform and restructuring in order to rebuild the American healthcare system and make it once again the envy of the world. Visit www.ReformFDA.org to sign the petition and learn more.

6 Responses to “When is a Vitamin Not a Vitamin? When the FDA Says So!”

  1. RonPaul2012 says:

    All I have to say is vote for Ron Paul 2012. We NEED our health freedom back, before its too late.

       2 likes

  2. LD says:

    vitamin B6 and P5P has proven to help patients who are bipolar or adhd. If you take this away from them, then they will have to resort to taking prescription medications.
    Apparently the vitamin industry is going to put the pharmaceutical industry out of business if they continue making vitamins. Thus , this must be the reason for banning vitamins.

       2 likes

    • Guest18 says:

      Um that IS what they are hoping to do. Why do they want people to buy vits when they can force us to buy toxic pharma’s and charge more. this is all really sad and &*^%$# up. Evil really.

         2 likes

  3. Jason says:

    Goodness me !
    What will the FDA ban next….. diHydrogen Oxide.

       2 likes

  4. Frank says:

    This is absolutely stupid! Why don’t they evaluate prescription drugs, and leave the vitimans alone.

       1 likes

    • tridoc927 says:

      They do focus on pharmaceuticals and in fact have been placing such high demands on them that many good drugs take forever to make it to market in the US. Europe has had Florastor, wonderful beneficial yeast that has both drug and probiotic properties, for 40 years and we just now have it in the US. On the other hand, many nutraceuticals and supplements do act as drugs if you take more than the normal physiologic amount. That doesn’t mean we don’t need them but some type of evaluation process would be great if it stopped the endless scamming of the American public with “weight loss” dietary supplements that don’t work. Everyone wants a magic pill to lose weight and doesn’t understand basic math calories in must be less than calories out to lose. No way around it. There are other areas where the public is being ripped off. So we need to find a fair and balanced approach that doesn’t stifle the emergence of new therapies but also reduces the rip off scams.

         0 likes

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy:
ANH-USA provides a comment forum for our readers to share their constructive thoughts and criticisms about our newsletter articles and engage in civil debate with other readers. All comments are pre-moderated regardless of author. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only remove those comments that are abusive, off-topic, use foul language, include personal attacks, or are otherwise discourteous and uncivil. Please do not post comments in ALL CAPS; on the internet this is considered "shouting."

 characters available

Follow us on...