FDA’s New Claim: “Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It!”

January 31, 2012
Print This Post Print This Post

stem cellIn another outrageous power-grab, FDA says your own stem cells are drugs—and stem cell therapy is interstate commerce because it affects the bottom line of FDA-approved drugs in other states!

We wish this were a joke, but it’s the US Food and Drug Administration’s latest claim in its battle with a Colorado clinic over its Regenexx-C™ procedure, a non-surgical treatment for people suffering from moderate to severe joint or bone pain using adult stem cells.

The FDA asserts in a court document that it has the right to regulate the Centeno-Schultz Medical Clinic for two reasons:

  1. Stem cells are drugs and therefore fall within their jurisdiction. (The clinic argues that stem cell therapy is the practice of medicine and is therefore not within the FDA’s jurisdiction!)
  2. The clinic is engaging in interstate commerce and is therefore subject to FDA regulation because any part of the machine or procedure that originates outside Colorado becomes interstate commerce once it enters the state. Moreover, interstate commerce is substantially affected because individuals traveling to Colorado to have the Regenexx procedure would “depress the market for out-of-state drugs that are approved by FDA.”

We discussed the very ambiguous issue of interstate commerce last September—it’s an argument the FDA frequently uses when the basis for their claim is otherwise lacking. As we noted then, the FDA holds that an “interstate commerce” test must be applied to all steps in a product’s manufacture, packaging, and distribution. This means that if any ingredient or tool used in the procedure in question was purchased out of state, the FDA would in its view have jurisdiction, just as they would if the final product had traveled across state lines.

This time the FDA just nakedly says in court documents that the agency wants to protect the market for FDA-approved drugs. No more beating around the bush—their agenda is right out in the open! This appears to be a novel interpretation of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C), as evidenced by the government’s failure to cite any judicial precedent for their argument.

The implication of the FDA’s interpretation of the law, if upheld by the court, would mean that all food, drugs, devices, and biologic or cosmetic products would be subject to FDA jurisdiction. The FDA is expanding its reach even to commerce within the state, which we argue is far beyond its jurisdiction, in order to protect drug company profits.

Last year we ran a two-part series on the current status of federal and state law—and FDA jurisdiction—and how it affects integrative treatments (part one and part two).

The Centeno-Schultz Medical Clinic takes your blood and bone marrow, puts it into a centrifuge machine that separates the stem cells, and cultures it to get more cells before a doctor puts them back in your body to repair damaged tissue. The FDA states that when the stem cells are cultured, they become FDA-regulated drugs. The clinic has argued numerous times that stem cells aren’t drugs because they are components of the patient’s bone marrow from his or her own body.

The FDA says otherwise: “Stem cells, like other medical products that are intended to treat, cure, or prevent disease, generally require FDA approval before they can be marketed. At this time, there are no licensed stem cell treatments.” There they go again, saying that components of your body are drugs and they have the authority to regulate them! It’s the only way the agency can claim that adult stem cell therapy is within FDA’s purview.

However, the agency seems to be of two minds. When ESPN magazine was doing a story on stem cell treatments, the FDA stated that US policy is to allow the injection of stem cells that are treated with “minimal manipulation,” which federal regulations define as “processing that does not alter the relevant biological characteristics of cells or tissues”—which is certainly the case with the Regenexx same-day procedure.

Despite this policy, FDA has been attacking the clinic for the past four years. They have tried injunctions and demanded inspections in their attempts to make the company bend; this court battle is merely the latest salvo.

The primary role of adult stem cells in a living organism is to maintain and repair the tissue in which they are found. The hard part has been to get enough of them. But new technology is giving doctors the ability to obtain more stem cells from a patient than previously thought possible, which is why we’re now seeing new treatments. Blood, fat, or tissue is withdrawn from the patient, stem cells are obtained using one of these new processes, and the cells are injected back into the patient where they can repair the patient’s tissue.

Gov. Rick Perry received this kind of stem cell therapy. We and others noted that the governor’s defense of freedom of healthcare choice when it came to his own treatment was starkly at odds with his directive to administer HPV vaccines to young girls against their own (and their parents’) wishes. It’s also at odds with his support for some of the most egregious witch-hunters on the Texas State Medical Board, which he appoints.

Behind Perry’s blatant inconsistency and the latest FDA attempted power grab lies the same problem: a medical system run by special interests under the leadership of the US government, the same government that is supposed to represent “we the people.”

Editors’ Note: An earlier version of this article reported that when blood and bone marrow were put into a centrifuge to separate the stem cells, the FDA considered the stem cells to be a drug and claimed authority to regulate them. The article has been updated to reflect that FDA only claims authority to regulate as drugs those stem cells which are cultured before being re-injected into the body.

139 Responses to “FDA’s New Claim: “Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It!””

  1. b says:

    Senate Document # 43; SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 62 (Pg 9, Para 2) April 17, 1933. ”The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership”is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.


  2. wayne fenton says:

    You don,t have the right to dictate what my heritage and genetics has given me if you want to make money off my body parts buy it from me, The FDA formed in 1906 is trying to say they have more rights to your body than you , humans have gone back years ,decades ,century,s before 1906 ,and they think they should control us like a shop made product just to give pharmaceutical company,s a guarantee of their profits its barbaric and against your human rights and privacy.

    Is this allowed in any other Country.

    Food and Drug Administration

    Agency overview
    Formed 1906[1]
    Preceding agencies Food, Drug, and Insecticide Administration (July 1927 to July 1930)
    Bureau of Chemistry, USDA (July 1901 through July 1927)
    Division of Chemistry, USDA (established 1862


  3. Brian Tilaro says:

    Okay folks, let’s look at this issue from a scientific and legal perspective, without chest-pounding or ineffective and trite comments.

    If the FDA can claim that a person’s own stem cells (manipulated, cultured, or not) are drugs and therefore have authority to regulate, then how can any abortions be legal when the same criteria is applied? Think about it. I am taking no position on abortion rights. This is purely an exercise in basic biology and semantics. Once a zygote is produced in the fallopian tube and is then fertilized by sperm, it becomes an embryonic stem cell ready to divide; becoming a fetus. The Supreme Court in Roe V. Wade ruled that a pregnant woman has a right to abort (or manipulate) an unborn fetus (a large collection of embryonic stem cells, at very early stages), because her body is her own property. This being the case, then how is that different than using your own adult stem cells for whatever purpose you like. Morality and political positions aside, the argument in Roe V. Wade is prima facie with regards to autologous adult stem cell manipulation. Therefore, if adult stem cells are classified as drugs and regulated by the FDA, then the FDA must likewise classify a fertilized zygote in the womb as a drug and regulate all abortions. Thus, taking away a woman’s reproductive rights as they currently exist; even to the extent of disempowering the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe V. Wade.

    Once again, I have no political or moral agenda in this essay. It is a scientific and semantic argument in favor of free and unfettered use of a person’s own adult stem cells.


  4. I was hoping ANH would take not of this FDA overreach. How about a petition? We have several petition examples here http://www.patientsforstemcells.org/take-action/


  5. Somnath Basu says:

    Having gone through all these comments, it appears that there are lot of objection on FDA’s role to put regulation on patient’s own body cells. The focal point of contention is that one’s own cell if implanted by any mode by a doctor to his body what harm is going to happen? Yes, the question of rejection of autologous cell by one’s body is true. but this does not guarantee the procedure will remain safe and effective for long years to come unless it is a statistically proven fact. Moreover the cells extracted from one’s body is manipulated or at least added with some kind of phosphate buffer, cells are expanded to a certain numbers before giving it to him. The protesters of FDA’s regulation may once again think that there may be mushrooming of various procedures without scientific debates. In India too there are such advertisements coming very often on electronic and other media. But the failure rates are not highlighted. there are certain objections from patients that in the name of modern day medical practices they are cheated exorbitant amount without healing.


    • Truth Seeker says:

      Natural Embryonic or adult stem cells are not a drug and cannot be patented, but once they are manipulated they can be patented and sold. Big bucks for the companies and more power to a very corrupt FDA.
      There are people on their deathbed that would be willing to take a chance with embryonic cells but the government can’t let that happen because if it works those patented stem cells would be worth nothing. It’s all about the money, and that’s it.
      I know of a patient that was killed the night before he was to be transferred to a university hospital back in 2005 to have the procedure done – Of course the report said natural circumstances.
      It’s bad enough that the lawyers are crooks but now doctors have become murderers.


Leave a Reply

Comment Policy:
ANH-USA provides a comment forum for our readers to share their constructive thoughts and criticisms about our newsletter articles and engage in civil debate with other readers. All comments are pre-moderated regardless of author. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only remove those comments that are abusive, off-topic, use foul language, include personal attacks, or are otherwise discourteous and uncivil. Please do not post comments in ALL CAPS; on the internet this is considered "shouting."

 characters available

Follow us on...