NYT Launches Attack on Supplement-Protecting Senator—Just as DSHEA Comes under Renewed Threat

July 19, 2011
Print This Post Print This Post

grassroots advocacy(Note: Please see the two related Action Alerts—one on the FDA’s new NDI guidance, the other on the Durbin bill—in the last paragraph of this article.)

The New York Times made nasty insinuations about both the supplement industry and Sen. Hatch, one of the two authors of DSHEA—and got the facts completely wrong about ANH-USA.

The New York Times recently ran a piece about Sen. Orrin Hatch’s support for the supplement industry. The article was full of innuendo about Sen. Hatch being in bed with supplement companies, in effect helping them make exaggerated claims to push their products. ANH got a similar treatment. The paper calls us “a trade group” (that is, a front for supplement companies) that helped defeat the McCain bill. This is similar to the treatment we received in the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) report which also identified us as a trade group.

The Alliance for Natural Health is not a trade group—we are a consumer-run and consumer-serving advocacy organization. Contrary to what the Times piece suggested, it was our activists—consumers who themselves buy nutritional supplements—who helped defeat the McCain bill. Access to natural health products is a consumer choice, and the pressure to protect them from drug-related interests isn’t coming from industry, lobbyists, or Washington “politics” as the Times (and the CREW report before it) claimed, but from consumers like you.

The article also repeats the familiar tactic of conflating a few bad actors with the entire nutritional supplement industry. The reporter was only able to point to a few companies that have made exaggerated health claims—yet made these anecdotes representative of the entire industry.

The article assumes that further regulation is needed. But the offenses they repeatedly point to—exaggerated health and disease claims, including steroids in supplements, etc.—are already illegal. As we have noted many times before, supplements are already subject to extensive regulation. In order to keep consumers safe, the FDA merely has to enforce the current regulations—not add new ones!

For example, Xango juice company is quoted as having thanked Sen. Hatch for “helping their exotic fruit juice business ‘operate without excessive intrusion’ from Washington,” and the piece reports that some supplement companies are making donations to Hatch’s campaign. This insinuates that Hatch was helping companies engage in questionable business practices by stepping in and opposing regulation. But as noted, exaggerated health claims are already illegal, and Sen. Hatch has never supported any illegal actions from this industry, legislatively or otherwise. The implication that, but for Hatch, companies would not be able to make exaggerated health claims, is ridiculous.

The piece further implies that Hatch has hindered regulators from preventing dangerous products from being put on the market, including supplements that are illegally spiked with steroids or other unapproved drugs. This is also ridiculous. The senator has never tried to prevent enforcement against illegal products. In fact, Sen. Hatch co-authored, along with Sen. Harkin, the DSHEA Full Implementation and Enforcement Act, a bill designed to bolster enforcement against the few supplement companies engaged in illegal behavior.

The Times article adopts a familiar paternalistic tone—as in, “We know what’s best for you!”—particularly in referring to natural health products as “niche industries or parochial programs.” In fact, over 50% of Americans use supplements, so supplements are hardly a “niche” interest. Is it any surprise that these citizens are making their voices heard?

The article presents the McCain bill as a law to protect consumers when in reality it would have greatly restricted consumer access to natural health products. One reason we fought so hard against the McCain bill was that it would have given the FDA full discretion and power to compile a list of supplements that would be allowed to remain on the market and ban the rest. This would have been completely arbitrary—just whatever the FDA decided to list, and we all know that the FDA is much too close to the drug industry and much too hostile to supplements.

We’ve seen what has happened in the European Union, with their adoption of strict new guidelines on supplement accesses, and we do not want to go down that path. The European Food Safety Authority has sharply reduced the list of available supplements and is in process of lowering the potencies allowed, e.g., less beta carotene than can be found in half of a large carrot.

There are numerous other problems in the New York Times article:

  • It suggests that McCain backed off his own bill because he was concerned about the damage to his campaign from a highly motivated industry. But industry didn’t “rally consumers”—opposition came from the groundswell of self-motivated grassroots opposition opposing the bill, with more than 200,000 messages from our activists alone.

  • It implicitly criticizes current legislation for not requiring supplements to be subject to the FDA drug approval process. But as regular Pulse readers know, this completely ignores the fact that manufacturers of natural, non-patentable substances cannot afford the billion-dollar costs associated with FDA drug approval, because without patent protection they would never make back their money.

  • The article claims, “Just in the last two years, 2,292 serious illnesses, including 33 that were fatal, were reported by consumers of supposedly harmless nutritional supplements, federal records show.” We contacted the New York Times and asked where this data came from, since we have not seen it elsewhere. They told us that an unnamed source within the FDA had given them these figures by phone. No such figures are available on the FDA website. Moreover, in its reporting of adverse events, the FDA does not presently break out supplements from drugs—perhaps because the agency does not want to highlight that almost all the adverse events are coming from pharmaceuticals that have gone through the FDA drug approval process.A federal agency that does publish annual statistics on supplement adverse events and deaths is the national Poison Control Center. Its 2009 Annual Report, which is the latest available data, records only a single death concurrent with supplement use—an “unknown dietary supplement or homeopathic agent”—with no deaths reported before 2009. (By way of comparison, the same report attributed 122 deaths to acetaminophen—an over-the-counter pain reliever sold under the brand name Tylenol.)

    It is notable that this one death was concurrent with an “unknown dietary supplement or homeopathic agent.” So there was an alleged supplement or homeopathic agent, but they don’t know what it was! Furthermore, for anyone who understands homeopathy, the notion that a homeopathic agent caused death is ludicrous. It is also completely inconsistent with the conventional medical view that homeopathy is just sugar pills that do nothing other than create a placebo effect. Conventional medicine can’t have it both ways: homeopathy can’t be both a killer and a harmless placebo.

  • It states that under legislation Hatch “pushed through Congress,” nutritional supplement companies could introduce products without FDA approval, and make general health claims without proving their effectiveness or safety.” But it is already illegal to make disease claims under DSHEA, and there are strict protocols for other claims.

The only doctor the article cites is Steven Novella. He is president and co-founder of the New England Skeptical Society—a group which, like its ally Quackwatch, is violently opposed to all Complementary and Alternative Medicine—hardly what you would call a balanced and unbiased source. He certainly is not representative of the high number of physicians who both recommend and take supplements themselves.

We find it interesting that less than two weeks before the Durbin bill was introduced and the FDA simultaneously released its New Dietary Ingredient (i.e., supplement) guidelines—both of them frontal attacks on DSHEA—we get this article in the New York Times defaming Sen. Hatch, one of the principal authors of DSHEA and one of few people still able to tell everyone what Congress’s original intent was when passing DSHEA. The irony is that Sen. Hatch is hardly someone who is anti-FDA—in fact, he has authored legislation to give the FDA more funding!

No, this carefully orchestrated campaign is nothing less than an attempt to crush DSHEA and outlaw the vast majority of nutritional supplements—which will ensure a total monopoly for the pharmaceutical industry.

To that end, we want to reiterate both our Action Alert on the Durbin bill and our Action Alert on the FDA’s NDI guidance. If you have not already done so, please send your messages to Congress on both these matters immediately. Your access to natural supplements is at risk.

100 Responses to “NYT Launches Attack on Supplement-Protecting Senator—Just as DSHEA Comes under Renewed Threat”

  1. don says:

    I am born into this world totally FREE.! I expect to choose what I want to do with MY body mind and spirit ! It is my God given FREE WILL! I will not allow a Government, a Religion or a Medical establishment usurp my power of that FREE WILL! Shame on all who is supporting usurping mankind choices of real nutritious foods no GMO’s! The teachings of REAL TRUTHS instead of HALF TRUTHS about WHO we really are! Those natural supplements are to sustain LIFE and every individual medical personnel no matter what field of their study did study and also took that Hippocratic oath!! Hippocrates taught healing the body was nothing really “MAGICAL” in fact his equation was quite simple healing with nutrition.Today our medical equation is quite complex! MD’s study an average of only two hours of nutrition added to this equation is the POWER,MONIES and CONTROL within the entities of BIG pharma , AMA and the FDA! What A SHAME!!

       0 likes

  2. Sybille Nova says:

    Evil will destroy itself. They can lie and lie and mispresent as long as they want…the day is coming soon, when all these presstitutes will

       0 likes

  3. Laurence Jordan says:

    My brother, mother and I are angry that the Congress/FDA are again interfering this power grab regarding vitamin supplementation. I have subscribed to Dr. Whitaker’s Health and Healing newsletter for more than 18 years and there has never been any reported deaths from taking natural vitamin and mineral supplements.

       0 likes

  4. Pauline Sokolowski says:

    I would rather take supplements then some OTC or perscription meds that say”don’t take if you have this condition or that and possible side effects that frighten you when you read them.

       0 likes

  5. Joseph C Moore, USN Ret says:

    The FDA and congress receive a fortune in lobby money to promote the pharmaceutical interests. Can you explain to me why billions have been spent to find a cure for diseases without any cures being found. Shouldn’t some of those billions been utilized to find PREVENTIVE methods for diseases? The pharmaceutical INDUSTRY does not want to lose those billions by finding CURES. That would make them irrelevant. There is a LAW that says: “only a DRUG can cure’ effectively proscribing (preventing) use of homeopathic or natural methods of treatment that have proven to treat supposedly incurable diseases. Many doctors have had their licenses revoked for use of these (alternative or homeopathic) treatments. There is definitely collusion between the government and the pharmaceutical industry to keep the citizenry dependent on a lifetime of (lifesaving?) drugs.

       0 likes

  6. Raleigh says:

    Pharmaceutical companies want us to take their voo doo chemicals and go die.

       0 likes

  7. Linda Zigich says:

    Over 110,000 deaths per year are attributed to pharmaceutical usage. Under 10,000 deaths attributed to illegal drugs. I don’t know of anyone dying from supplements so why the attack on them? Seems big-pharma is creating ‘genocide” American style. That means they kill people not for power but for profit. To think we went after Bin Laden when perhaps the real terrorists are right here.

       0 likes

  8. william kloppenburg says:

    Keep up the good fight!

       0 likes

  9. Ona says:

    This isn’t the first New York Times article I’ve read in support of Big Pharma greed, to the point of freely libeling pro-consumer people and organizations. I would be most interested in an expose of the corrupt connection between NYT and Big Pharma. I wonder if it includes a connection to the Rockefellers who own 50% of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry.

       0 likes

  10. When I was studying Journalism at MSU, I thought that the NYT was one of the best News Papers. It seems they have lost their honest reporting and are more interested in certain business companies that pay a lot for their adds.

    I took classes in later life that taught herbals and other natural foods that heal. They work for me and others that I know who use the natural. One should learn as much as they can and learn what to look for when using natrual vitamins and herbs. Be an educated user. Don’t rely on the pros that make a lot of money with prescription medicine. Making money is their only aim. A lot of drugs are not tested long enough, then after prolems evolve and they are pulled off too late for too many people.

       0 likes

  11. Linda Zigich says:

    Over 110,000 deaths per years are attributed to pharmaceutical usage. Under 10,000 deaths attributed to illegal drugs, and I don’t know of anyone dying from supplement use, so why the attack on supplements? Seems big-pharma is creating “genocide” American style – - that means we are killed off, not for gain of power, but for profit. And to think we were after BinLaden. Makes you wonder who are the real terrorists?

       0 likes

  12. Rev. Virginia Belt says:

    ANH, If you ARE a “trade company,” then what I find most astonishing is that there is not ONE SINGLE advertisement on this whole page! Not just no ads for supplements, but no ads, period. And, for the record, I see nothing whatever wrong with getting support for your group through advertising.

       0 likes

  13. W Smith says:

    This is just another blatant attempt by “Big Brother” to control every aspect of our lives, as the “new World Order” marches into power!
    HELLO socialism. Goodby sweet liberty. :-( .
    No one will be allowed to make any personal decisions and every aspect of our lives will be controlled, by the state, in the near future. We have very little true liberty left as it is now.

       0 likes

  14. JOHN LONGENECKER says:

    Hello. Our Big Corporate Typing Pool is at it again. The selected typist this time is Senator John McCain. Typically America Inc. / Big Corporations have the Media / Press / NYT typing up stuff for them as well and printing what they are told to print. Sen. Orin Hatch this time around has good info from the nutritional supplement folks. So we see here America Inc. going after a somewhat smaller corporate player, yet still selecting a number of typists from their FDA Corporate Typing Pool. America Inc. seeks to stay in the background as is typical and present the battle as a U.S. Govt. battle with the FDA / McCain on the ice rink floor with Sen. Hatch. Take a closer look as you always ought to do. It’s America Inc. bashing something to get it out of their way so the can get more of their own financial transactions. America Inc. makes money selling prescription drugs. They don’t want no healthy nutritional supplements being sold in America. So America Inc. goes to Our American Corporate Typing Pool – the U.S. Senate / House / FDA / more Agencies and selects which of their Typists will type up what they want this time. T. Jefferson and the early folks did not set it up this way in the Declaration of Independence / U.S. Constitution / Bill of Rights but in 2011 that’s the way it is. Later in 2012 a National Corporate Typing Pool Supervisor will be selected by America Inc. for a four year term. That’s it. Stay tuned. JOHM LONGENECKER

       0 likes

  15. Tim Hart says:

    I read the piece and I am working my way through the comments on the article. I am seething! I don’t know why I put myself through this! But please go and do it, too. Brew yourself a nice cup of chamomile or linden tea (or take your Xanax–just kidding) and read the comments. You’ll learn what we are up against. (Is this the “left” that is writing this junk? Geez, are they ever ignorant!)

    Anyway, comments are closed, but if you (gag) register for the NYT website (free) you can still click the “recommend” buttons. Our side is woefully under-represented!

       0 likes

  16. I hope you will reconsider this bii as I am alive today with curing my cancer with supplements and herbs and also in Nov last year I had 3 stage kidney failure caused by my perscription drug Lisinoplril and I got all my numbers back in good shape with several supplements that friends had taken for their kidney problems. Please let us make our own choices about what we want to take for our health and let the FDA and the goverment control and test the perscription drugs better.

       0 likes

  17. Robert Morrow says:

    Just why the New York Times does not call for an investigation of the FDA (real name MURDER FOR CORPORATE PROFIT INC.) I understand that just like many Senators their hands are blood stained from the 30 pieces of sliver the get. The FDA approves poison drugs that kill thousands before withdrawn from the market. Vioxx murdered 200,000 before it was removed. Why? the Pharmaceuticals need to reap their 30,000 % profit on each tablet. They scream and holler about the evil oil companies and their 4 to 5% profit. Yet, no one complains about the 30,000% profit charged for the death drugs that are pushed by the AMA/Pharmaceutical trained drug pushing Doctors and all for great profit to buy your Senator. Then there is the 15,000 or more toxins allow to be put in your processed foods. Just to prove a point I will cover one, AZODICARBONAMIDE whose primary use is the production of foamed plastics and outlawed in all most all countries to be used in foods, yet the FDA said it is OK. I sure hope that you like your plastic foam breads and buns. This is not the only one, there are thousands. You wonder why people are sick, obese, well this is the cause. If the corrupt congress with their blood stained hands would stop taking the bribes and shut down the FDA and its Terrorism of the citizens, take the poison profit making poisons out foods we could most likely start to balanced the budget and have health citizens again.

       0 likes

  18. Marie Adams says:

    Do not let misinformation from the press that do no research on what they print and are antagonist to natural supplements and in bed with the pharmaceuticals, whose main goal is to tout their drugs which kill people. Supplements do not kill!. Senators Durbin’s bill s an outright affront to DSHEA. The people worked long and hard to get the Congress to give the supplement industry protection from such sources as above. The DSHEA needs strengthening not tearing down. Do not cave in to this irresponsible campaign fostered by Senator Durbin and his pals, despite the attacks by the press on Senator Hatch and ANH. These are fraudulent and very misleading.

       0 likes

  19. Craig says:

    Please make the list of over 300 substances banned by the European Union that are used in products in this country. Please, truth in advertising is paramount! NO FDA enforcement please!

       0 likes

  20. Joan Lawrence says:

    This is an extremely well-written and researched article. Thank you. Clearly there is a campaign involving many government and media voices with the ultimate goial of giving all authority over ‘medicne’ (if one can call pharmaceuticals medicine) to the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry.Coincidentally, there is a movement harrassing the organic food industry. There are already raids on health food stores, raw milk and the like and perhaps some energy against growing one’s own food. So, ultimately we would have no supplements and only GMOs to eat. The way I see it, that means illness would rise which would fill the pocketbooks of the medical profession, pharmaceutical industry, Monsanto and all bed fellows. Where does that leave us?

       0 likes

  21. Sean says:

    What is wrong with people? They must be “brain dead” from the chlorine and flouride in the water, and microwave radiation, especially the FDA. The NYT is not and American newspaper or a credible source of information. For example; marijuana hasn’t killed anybody in the last several thousand years, yet people make up as many lies about the plant and it’s uses. They see the plant as a threat, when it’s just a plant with many uses for humans.

    When is everybody going to wake up to the fact that supplements have been used long before dangerous pharmaceutical companies began creating deadly and lethal combinations of chemicals called drugs. Humans have been using herbs and natural supplements for thousands of years without severe side effects or lethal consequences.

    The FDA needs to stick to regulating dangerous DRUGS manufactured by Pharmaceutical Companies not supplements. I see advertisements for drugs that all have some of the most dangerous side effects, yet the FDA allows this kind of advertisement on television, how irresponsible and dangerous for the uneducated. Governments have killed more humans than all of the wars combined over the last 2000 years.

       0 likes

  22. doris hochheiser says:

    supplements have dramaticallychanged my life for the better for over 45 years and I have always worked with knowledgable medical doctors who have prescribed their dosage for me.

       0 likes

  23. Lisa Chrysler says:

    please, please, please – for the sake of our families as well as yours! – leave us to decide what is best – supplements used properly are most beneficial – this should not be about protecting the profits of big pharma. please use your conscience!

       0 likes

  24. olive jordan says:

    I feel the vitamin supplements I take help me keep healthy. I am 92 and have no serious health problems, and that is the reason.

       0 likes

  25. Ronn L. says:

    Have you, by request or offering, given these points or entire letter as a rebuttal to the NYT? If not , then you’re just ‘preaching to the choir’ here at anh-usa.org. These facts have to be put out there on public display the same as the NYT ’s innuendos. They’re smart. They know that more notice will be taken of the innuendos than the time and effort taken to check facts. (who sponsored what, who voted for what, what legislation is on the books , what legislation is coming up…)

       0 likes

  26. I am an adult capable of making my own educated decisions. If I am interested in a new or different product I am unfamiliar with, the first thing I do is research it.The pros and cons is necessary to examine to determine its usefulness for my situation.

    I am also a diabetic. I have spent 57 years living with this condition in my household and with relatives on both sides of my family. The majority of those relatives died before their 50th birthday. Of course, not one single death certificate states “Cause of Death: Diabetes” But every single person in the family and friends of the family know their deaths were because of the inability of the pharmaceutical industry to control their condition.

    Approximately 60 days ago I walked into my doctor (an endocrinologist – tops in his field) and told him he has today to give me some new plan, new method to help me and my condition. Their inability for over 7 years now to show any kind of improvement in my condition, even though I was following their instructions, was exasperating. All I received from them was more medications, higher dosages and more recriminations I must do this, this and that. All of which I was already doing as per their instructions. I mentioned if I do not hear a different plan of action during this appointment, tomorrow morning the entire list of bottles, pills and medications was going into the trash. I was at the point, life could dish out to me what it wished.

    My doctor had the courage and the confidence in me to know my threat was a promise. He did the only thing he knew that may help me. He not only gave me the contact information, a name and phone number, of an Alternative Medicine practitioner – he also gave me the courtesy of placing a phone call to this doctor to get me the appointment. Why? Because this particular doctor, who is tops in his field, knew he was out of methods which may help me. But he also knew I would never get that appointment because this physician of Alternative Medicine had a closed practice to new patients. He had already reached his limitations.

    It is now 91/2 weeks later. I have thrown away 2 of my former medications. I no longer need them. I have reduced 5 others by a 75% less daily capacity, because I no longer need them. I made an appointment this morning for testing of another one. Why – because I believe I no longer need it. This new doctor has done for me in less than 90 days what conventional medicine could not accomplish in close to a decade.

    Yes, I have worked hard the last 9 weeks to make this new program work. But I worked hard for over those 7 years to make that program work also, all with no satisfactory results.

    I will not ever let anyone tell me, or convince me, of the ineffectiveness of Alternative Medicine. This is not the first time in my life I have received satisfactory results from Alternative Medicine, and I am glad to say it will not be the last. I can actually state truthfully Alternative Medicine has helped me three times in my life, all after conventional medicine had failed.

    The sorry part of this whole equation is decisions are being made by people who have no knowledge of the usefullness and effectiveness of many forms of CAM. To even contemplate removing or reducing its availability to the public at large, this is the crime. But money in this country always talks. When is someone going to have the courage to tell corporate America enough is enough. For this one time, we are going to side with the policy of “betterment for the people at large.”

       0 likes

  27. Margaret Lawson says:

    Washington leaders need to stick with trying to “fix” the country….and leave the supplement issues alone…..they have stuck their noses into too much now…

       0 likes

  28. Gail says:

    All change happens in conversation. Without a conversation about something..it doesn’t exist. The above conversation is in a right/wrong framework. Allopathic drugs are right; alternative supplement/herbs are wrong. As long as this is the framework of the conversation, nothing can shift…it will be survival of the “loudest, most powerful with the most money.” However, the American people deserve better…what if we as a community (people who support alternative health) refuse to engage in the “he said, she said” conversation and only converse about our rights. We have a right to make choices about what we put or don’t put in our bodies. This is an inalienable right. There is room for both types of medical care in our society. I realize this is a tame, perhaps weak conversation given what this article and many hundreds of others are telling us; however, as long as we are forced to have to “fight” on conventional medicine’s turf, we will never be able to progress beyond right and wrong to a place of choice. I don’t know how to make this shift…the only thing i know is to keep fighting as ANH does (thank God!) and also begin a very large conversation in the world about freedoms and rights! That, after all, is the real issue here behind the issue at hand.

       0 likes

  29. Joe Herzog says:

    We’ve known for years that Sen. Hatch has protected the supplement industry because 25% of all the supplements on store shelves are produced in Utah. There are serious problems, not only among the general population, but with HS and collegiate athletes taking supplements that contain banned substances. There have been numerous attempts to regulate (not restrict) supplements simply by getting them to list in plain language everything that is contained in any single supplement. Hatch has always been their protector, and that is general knowledge.

       0 likes

  30. Royce Hamer says:

    I am appalled at the corrupt methods the pharmaceutical cartel goes to to try to eliminate competition. This form of propaganda should be punishable by law. Crimes against humanity since we all need the nutrients available in supplements for quality of life. We did not evolve because of pharmaceuticals but on nutrition that was growing naturally and for the most part plentiful. To treat the population with fairness we need more emphasis on supplements and less on killer legal drugs.

       0 likes

  31. Trish says:

    The New York Times, like most media, is controlled by big corporations. They don’t care about the people any more than big pharma and Politicians bought by big pharma. Disgusting! You’d think that some of these big corporations would understand that if supplements are banned, their children and grandchildren would be affected in the future also.

    WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO OUR FREEDOM??? HOW CAN THEY TAKE AWAY OUR CHOICE TO TAKE VITAMINS? WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO OUR COUNTRY?

       0 likes

  32. Rusty Waters says:

    I am so grateful that an institute like the DSHEA exists and protects the right of consumers to continue to choose natural supplements to help with health and health related issues.
    I would be dead without my supplements.

       0 likes

  33. drug companies run our country. they are the reason cannabis is illegal. its too beneficial for medical problems,its got to stay outlawed! many folks could use cannabis for mood,physical problems. threat to he drug dealer doctors and their killing addicting meds.

       0 likes

  34. Laurence Topliffe says:

    So you are telling us the problem with the article. Are you telling the NY Times?

       0 likes

  35. I read the NY Times every Sunday and am very disappointed in their coverage of both ANh and Senator Hatch, who I know personally. Can I do anything to help?

       0 likes

  36. thomas mc dugall says:

    in my opinion Utah is one of the most loosely regulated States in the country in many areas of consumer protectionsupplements being just one of the major threats. I believe your assumptions of his non involvement would not stand up unde oath.

    Ii for one will move out of this dangerous state as soon as possible. Along with Hatch the state elected representatives in my opinion are even worse protectors . .

       0 likes

  37. ginger pepper says:

    The deaths from pharmaceutical drugs is staggering. How about the liver damage that goes uncheckek from these FDA approved drugs? I have taken supplements for over 40 years and they have improved my health. This is a political ploy for the almighty pharma industry to control and charge the people more money for their vitamin supplements. Big pharma makes billions in profits already, so leave out vitamins out of your profiteering.

       0 likes

  38. Louse Wrathall says:

    It is none of the business of any elected government official nor is it their right to restrict our access to supplements and DSHEA should be respected and left alone because it has worked well.

       0 likes

  39. Steve Novak says:

    This is simply whining by an industry who wants no regulation, yet can’t afford the FDA to check out their products for dangers to humans.

    You can’t be inspected, you can’t sell. Instead of all this typical TeaPublican claims of corporate omnipotence and, please, POOR widdle Senator Hatch, one of the Tea Terrorists trying to bring down this economy. – you lose.

    No credibility.

       0 likes

    • dez says:

      Thats what you have. No credibility. Thats what the FDA says about supplements and herbals. Yet they have proven themselves every day, and for hundreds of years, some for thousands of years. I have used Vitamins and supplements for almost 50 years without a doctor or drugs and looking at my 80th birthday in very good health.

         0 likes

  40. This is just another attack on our personal freedoms in freedomless America.

       0 likes

  41. Marcia L. Ackerman says:

    As someone with MS who is careful about which rx pharmaceuticals to take and am just as careful about which supplements to take, I have seen the FDA approve a medicatin for MS, pull the same medicatin off the market (due to deaths) and place the same medication back on the market, yerars later, which has now resulted in dozens of deaths. Why is the FDA not focusing on pharmaceuticals that are known to cause mortality? Isn’t that their job? if supplements are at the same level of problem as this MS medication why don’t they provide the numbers directly attributed to that supplement?

       0 likes

  42. Fernando Craff says:

    Where is our freedom?, this country was founded on the freedom of its citizens, but when it comes to health, the FDA, big pharmaceutical companies and many US senators want to impose on us their drug “garbage”, so we can stay sick for their profits. IT IS TIME TO STOP THIS MADNESS AND LET US LIVE OUR LIVES THE WAY WE WANT WITHOUT INTERFERENCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT.

       0 likes

  43. Tina Pruitt says:

    It is my hope that you are going to send something to the NYT refuting their facts.

    Thanks, Tina Pruitt

       0 likes

  44. I have tried to submit your petitions on your website to protect supplements, but they will not go through. Just thought you would like to know. I have not had this problem before on your site.

       0 likes

  45. andrew f kittsley says:

    Hey, New York Times,
    While I stand shoulder to shoulder to you when it comes to ” All Things Political”,
    you have, uncharacteristically – and unfortunately – gone quite wide of the mark
    on this issue.
    Perhaps you should check with ANH and Sen. Hatch BEFORE you assume to know
    what is going on.
    Not only is that better policy for understanding, it is also the Prime Directive for reportage.
    It used to be the strong suit of the New York Times.
    Please get back. to it.
    Andrew

       0 likes

  46. Joe Spies says:

    Maybe we all should cancel/boycot the New York Times (are they associated with Murdock??)

       0 likes

  47. Marygrace Coneff says:

    Stop telling lies! I have been saved by supplements. I was almost dead with pharmaceuticals. What would I choose? To have the choice to choose supplements over medication that has not proven successful or helpful, but harmful and damaging.

       0 likes

  48. Truth and Light says:

    The NYT is owned by one of the largest chemotherapy manufacturers in the world. The NYT will never run articles that are pro wellness, or pro Complementary Alternative Medicine, or pro supplements. Is anyone is under the delusion that the news media isn’t biased one way or another? Once news reporting became a profit center for the networks instead of a SERVICE, we stopped getting real unbiased news. The only way we can determine what’s going on is to read between the lines, look at the sources of the stories, follow the money!

    http://moneycentral.msn.com/ownership?Symbol=NYT

       0 likes

  49. Bruce Balter says:

    Get off the false front in the fake issues while the truth is avoided.

       0 likes

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy:
ANH-USA provides a comment forum for our readers to share their constructive thoughts and criticisms about our newsletter articles and engage in civil debate with other readers. All comments are pre-moderated regardless of author. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only remove those comments that are abusive, off-topic, use foul language, include personal attacks, or are otherwise discourteous and uncivil. Please do not post comments in ALL CAPS; on the internet this is considered "shouting."

 characters available
ONLINE COMMUNITY

Follow us on...